All manuscripts submitted to JERSS Multidisciplinary: Journal of Education, Religion, Social, and Science undergo a series of structured and rigorous editorial processes, including a double-blind review system in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to ensure objectivity and integrity in the evaluation process. Upon submission through the online submission system, the assigned section editor conducts an initial screening. This stage aims to assess the manuscript’s eligibility for further review, including its alignment with the journal’s focus and scope, the preliminary quality of its content, and its compliance with the established author guidelines.

If the manuscript meets the initial criteria, it proceeds to the peer review stage, where it is evaluated anonymously by qualified experts in the relevant field. This process typically involves at least two reviewers. In certain cases—particularly when there are significant differences in reviewers’ evaluations or recommendations—additional reviewers may be invited to ensure a more comprehensive and balanced assessment. All feedback, critiques, and recommendations provided by the reviewers serve as the primary basis for editorial consideration.

At the final stage, the editorial board of JERSS Multidisciplinary: Journal of Education, Religion, Social, and Science deliberates collectively by taking into account the reviewers’ reports. Based on this evaluation, a final decision is made regarding whether the manuscript is accepted for publication, accepted with revisions (either minor or major), or rejected. This multi-layered process is designed to ensure that every published article meets high academic standards, demonstrates strong relevance, and contributes meaningfully to the advancement of knowledge.